Archive for category General

THE DECIBEL [dB]

The decibel, abbreviated dB, is used to denote a ratio that is ten times, or “deci” times, a unit the “Bel,” as so named by its celebrated devisor whose name it bears, Alexander Graham Bell, the inventor of the telephone. The decibel, dB, thus became the commonly used unit of measure for expressing a change in power from an original setting to that being measured, that is to say, a dB is a relative power measurement.
Since dB expresses a dimension-less ratio between two power-levels, the caveat for the measurement is that it must be taken at the same point as the reference so as to have the same “acoustical impedance.” Whereas, acoustical impedance, symbolized ρ•c, is the product of the density, ρ, of the medium of propagation, and the speed, c, of sound in it.
The dB is therefore used to express a relative increase or decrease in acoustic power or pressure, and their corresponding electric power-levels, as a ratio with either a previous level or a specified standard, or a reference. Such reference typically is in the style of a minimum discernible signal, a MDS, at a sound receptor such as the human ear, whose minimum audible field, the MAF, for the human ear is referenced as 0 dB.
This MAF for the human ear has been measured by experimentation to be at an Intensity, I, of 1.0 x10-16 W/m2 expressed as a Power per unit Area, This equates to a minute pressure, p, of 2.0 x 10-4 dyn/cm2, which most often is expressed as ref 20μPa, whereas 20 micro-Pascals is a pressure in MKS units.
The smallest change in sound-power level, ΔP, the normal human ear can detect, or “sense,” is about 1 dB ref Po. More than likely, such hearing sensitivity was considered by Alexander Graham Bell as the minimum change to which all other sound should be referenced.
Thus, by definition, a decibel, 1 dB ref Po, is ten times the base-ten logarithm of a power ratio equal to the one-tenth root of ten. For instance, the power per unit area, the “Sound Intensity Level,” SIL, of a quiet whisper is measured to be 18 dB, that is, its “volume” was 18 dB above the MAF. If that particular volume-setting is increased in intensity by 25.9%, then by this convention it is said to be “up” 1 dB ref Po, where ref Po denotes the original setting 18 dB.
This widely acknowledged convention is shown below in notational form:
(The number of) dB ref Po = 19 dB – 18 dB = 1 dB ref Po; and,
converting 1 dB by dividing by 10 yields the exponent of ten as 100.1,
which equals 1.259 and denotes a 25.9% increase above the original.
Further, to be precise, +3dB ref Po by logarithmic calculation is the result of a doubling of its original power level, such that:
10log10 [(2.0 ∙ Po) ÷ (Po)] = 10log10 [(100.30103)]; and,
rounding the exponent to 0.3 the calculation approximates
10log10 [(100.1)3] = 3 dB ref Po, which is a cube of its base value.
Moreover, a +10 dB gain in power level implies a 10-fold increase over the original level, 10 :: 1, whereas a -20 dB loss implies a 100-fold decrease, 1/100 :: 1, such that:
10log10 [101 ÷ 100] = 10 x (+1 – 0) = +10 dB ref Po; and,
10log10 [10-2 ÷ 100] = 10 x (-2 – 0) = -20 dB ref Po.
The decibel is also used to express either voltage or current ratios, as either an electro-motive force, E, in units of volts, V, or a magneto-motive force, I, in units of amperes, A. Notably, these electrical forces are squared terms in their respective power-expressions, acting as if their motive force was an “electrical-pressure,” where P = E2/R = I2R; and,
P2, in dB ref P1, = 10log10 [(V2 /V1)2], and 10log10 [(A2 /A1)2]; or,
= 20log10 [(V2 /V1)], and 20log10 [(A2 /A1)], whereas R1 = R2.
Strictly though, when the decibel is used to express voltage or current ratios in lieu of power ratios, then the voltages or currents in the expression must be measured at places having identical electrical impedances, that is, R1 ≡ R2.
Further, by extension, the relation between the number of decibels and the corresponding ratios of voltages and currents are sometimes applied where the values in the ratios are not the square roots of the corresponding electrical power ratios, that is, not from the initial E22/R2 and E12/R1 expressions. To preclude confusion, a specific statement of the particular application should accompany such usage. Preferably, such extensions of terms should be avoided.
Intensity, I, is defined in units of power, P, applied over an area, A, which is in units of square-length unit, such as m2. Whereas, P is work per increment of time, t, in units of seconds, s, and work is a force, F, applied in a given distance, or length, l, then P is in units for force-length per time, F∙l/t, such as, ft•lbf/s, dyn•cm/s, or N•m/s.
As defined in Newton’s Laws, F is the instantaneous rate of change of momentum with respect to time; whereas, momentum is the inertia of a body-mass, m, moving with some velocity, v, and defined in units of mass-length per increment of time, t.
By calculus, the time-derivative of this defining product for momentum, as it undergoes an instantaneous rate of change with respect to an infinitesimal increment of time, dt, yields an expression that defines force, F, with two additive terms. The first term is the multiplication of the mass, m, by the time-derivative of the velocity, v, which yields, m∙ (dv/dt). The second additive term is the multiplication of the velocity, v, by the time-derivative of the mass, m, which yields, v∙ (dm/dt).
Notably, for momentum, if only the velocity term is undergoing an instantaneous rate of change with respect to time, but not its mass, then dm/dt = 0, and thus the additive term of v∙(dm/dt) = 0. Therefore, classically, F = m∙a, where dv/dt = a, which is acceleration in units of length per square-time, ft/s2, cm/s2, or m/s2, where m is the symbol for mass in units of lbf/ft/s2, g or kg, whereas Force, F, is expressed in units of lbf, dyn, or N—a la, a Newton of force.

Definition. Sound is a distinguishing physical wave, a sound-wave, per se. Lord Raleigh in his work, “Theory of Sound,” volumes 1 and 2, Dover Publications, New York, 1945, defined a sound-wave as an alteration in pressure, stress, particle displacement, or particle velocity that is propagated in an elastic material, or the superposition of such propagated alterations in that medium. Further, a sound-sensation is produced through the ear by the above alterations.
Van Nostrand’s Scientific Encyclopedia defines sound somewhat more physically as a longitudinal elastic wave-motion propagated by alternate compressions and rarefactions of the medium. The analogy stated therein is that sound is like the propagation of a “bump,” or a “jerk,” from a freight-train’s engine to its caboose.
Thus, a sound-wave of acoustical energy only can propagate in a medium, being it a gas, a liquid, or a solid; and, it is either deflected or refracted, or both, at the laminar boundary between media of differing densities. In the denser media, or in a heated gas, the molecules orbit in closer proximity to one another such that the “bumps” propagate faster. Distinctly, the closer the orbiting molecules are to one another then the better the propagation of the sound– that is, the sound is demonstrably “louder.” Conversely, void of any molecules to “bump,” such as in a vacuum, sound cannot propagate; in other words, you cannot hear yourself scream in space.
Sound-intensity is defined as Power per unit area, which is the average rate (time) of sound-energy transmitted in a specified direction as it impinged on an area normal to this direction of propagation. In notational form, sound-intensity, I, of a spherical-wave, or even a plane-wave, in the direction of propagation can be expressed as being directly proportional to the square of its impinging pressure and indirectly proportional to the acoustic impedance in which it is propagating, that is:
I = [(pressure) 2 ÷ (medium-density) ∙ (sound-speed)].
I is expressed in terms of the square of the impinging sound-pressure, p, with respect to the acoustical impedance of the medium, ρ∙c. Accordingly, the resultant-product of the density of the medium, ρ, multiplied by the speed of sound, c, in that medium, is (kg/m3) ∙ (m/s) in MKS-units, which further reduces to Newton-seconds per cubic-meter, N∙s/m3. The square of p is in (N/m2)2. And, to be a comparable sound-intensity level, the sensed I must be in a ratio with a previously sensed level, or a reference-level, I ref, where both are in units of power per an area common to both, P/Ao, a la, the sensing area of the ear, or the sensing area of an underwater transducer.
In either case, Ao is a unit-area equal to 1, since A1 ≡ A2, such that A1 / A2 = 1. Therefore, sound-intensity, I, in SI-units, is Watts per unit-square-meter, W/mo2, that is:
F, in N, = kg∙m/s2; when v∙ (dm/dt) = 0; whereas,
P, in W, = [(kg∙m/s2) •m/s] = N•m/s; whereas,
I, inW/m2 = [(N•m/s)/m2]; factored with (N/m2) ∙ (m2/N) • (s/s) = 1.0, yields,
I, inW/m2 = [(N•m/s)/m2]•[(N/m2)∙(m2/N)•(s/s) = [(N/m2)2] ÷ [N∙s/m3]; which is I, inW/m2 = [(N/m2)2]•[(kg•m/s2)•s/m3)] = [(N/m2)2] ÷ [(kg/m3)•(m/s) = p2/ρc.
Particularly, the squared sound-pressure, p2, is expressed in units of (N/m2)2, and the acoustic impedance, ρ∙c, is expressed in units of N∙s/m3. Thus, I reduces to (N•m/s)/m2, which relates to power per unit-area, P/Ao, which in W/m2 can be converted to CGS-units by multiplying by W/m2 by a conversion factor of 107, and conversely by 10-7.
Discernibly though, when sound-intensity, I, as P/Ao, is expressed in dBref, then it is known as a Sound-Intensity Level, SIL; and, by decibel-definition is expressed as a power ratio for a common area, a la, a unit-area, in that, SILdB = 10log10 [P1 :: Po], where Po is some Pref MDS.
Typically, the measure of SILdB in any medium is referenced, that is, “zeroed,” to some set standard, which is not necessarily the MDS that the acoustical receptor can detect, a la, “sense,” in that medium. For veritable comparison of differing sound-intensity levels given in decibels, dB, it is imperative that this reference-level be noted.
Simply though, the ratio of I2 / I1 reduces to p22 / p12, where ρ∙c / ρ∙c = 1. Thus, for a Sound-Pressure Level, SPLdB, in air, the reference, pref air, is the Minimum-Audible-Field, the MAF, for the human ear in air, which is:
pref MAF = 2.0 x 10-4 dyn/cm2 = 2.0 x 10-5 N/m2 = 20 x 10-6 Pa
= 20 μPa, where N/m2 is defined in MKS units as a Pascal, Pa.
Remarkably though, for sensing acoustical sound-pressure levels in water, modern-day electrostriction-ceramic transducers, coupled with advanced digital, number-crunching, acoustic signal processors, are “zeroed” to 1 μPa, which is 20 times more sensitive as a reference than the MAFair; whereas,
20log10 [(1/20) μPa] = -26 dB ref 20 μPa “down” from that for 20 μPa.
The characteristic acoustical impedances for differing media are experimentally determined, and the measurement of each is certified as a physical constant for universal reference. As such, the gaseous density of air and the speed of sound in it are delineated below– as measured in the sonic frequency range at 0 degrees Celsius, C, and 760 millimeters of mercury, mmHg, with 0.03-mole-percent content of CO2. Furthermore, from 0o C to about +20o C, the speed of sound in air, cair, demonstrably varies by a factor of [60.7 x Tdegrees C]. For reference some comparable values are shown below:
Density of medium: ρo air = 1.2931 x 10-3 g/cm3 at 760 mmHg; and,
ρ1 air 200 C = 1.2078 x 10-3 g/cm3 at 760 mmHg.
Speed of Sound: co air = 3.3145 x 104 cm/sec at 0oC; and,
c1 air 20oC = 3.4359 x 104 cm/sec at 20oC; such that,
Acoustic Impedance: ρo∙c air = 4.2860 x 101 dyn∙s/cm3, and,
ρ1∙c air 20oC = 4.1499 x 101 dyn∙s/cm3.

Moreover, SIL ref air is derived from the p ref MAF, which is 2.0 x 10-4 dyn/cm2, thus:
I air, in W/cm2 = (2.0 x10-4)2 ÷ (4.2860 xl01) = 9.3327 x10-10; convert with x10-7,
Io air, in W/m2 = (9.3327 xl0-10 x10-7) = 9.3327 x10-17; then, in dB,
SIL ref W/m2 = 10log10 [(9.3327 x l0-17) = [9.7 dB -170 dB]
≈ -160 dB ref, the reference; whereas, the inverse-log yields,
Io air, in W/m2 = 10-16 W/m2, which is the reference, Io air; therefore,
SIL dB = 10log10 [I] -10log10 [Io air]; whereas, for Sound Pressure Level,
SPL dB = 20log10 [p] -20log10 [po air]; whereas, a SIL of -160 dB equates to
SIL dB = 0 dB as referenced to 10-16 W/m2; and,
1 dBref 10-16W/m2= -159.3 dB – (-160.3 dB] = 10log10 [10-15.93] -10log10 [10-16.03];
10-15.93 x107 = (p)2 ÷ 4.286 x101; then, solving for p yields,
p = 2.244 xl0-4 dyn/cm2 = 2.244 x10-5 N/m2 = 2.244 x10-5 Pa; where,
(2.244×10-5 Pa) ÷ (6.8945 xl03 Pa/lbf/in2) = 3.255 x l0-9 lbf/in2.
This is the math that proves that our binaural hearing system can detect very minute changes in sound-pressure levels, within our audible frequency-range. By convention, that audible frequency-range is known as the [our] sonic band. Its range is from 16 Hz to 16 kHz, with a maximum sensitivity at about 2 kHz, from which our 2,000 Hz conversational band extends to about 4 kHz . Also, by convention, frequencies below 16 Hz are sub-sonic, whereas those above 16 kHz are ultra-sonic, and thereby denote sound-frequencies that are inaudible—for us. Notably, super-sonic is a speed greater than the speed of sound, c, in reference to the medium of propagation.
Sound percussions, “beats and bumps,” vary in intensity. As an example, consider an explosion of 50 pounds of TNT, which results in a change of SPL equal to one atmosphere, Δ14.6972 lbf/in2. The SPLdB for this near-instantaneous change of pressure– measured 10 feet from the source, reference 0.0002 dyn/cm2, or 20 μPa, is as follows:
SPL ref 20 μPa = 20log10 [(14.6972 lbf/in2)∙(6.8945 x103 Pa/lbf/in2)] -201og10 [20 x10-6Pa]
≈ [40 +60 dB] – [26 -120 dB] = 194 dB ref 20 μPa; whereas,
1.000 atm = (14.6972)∙(6.8945 x103 Pa)∙(9.869 x10-6 atm/Pa)
= 1.0 xl06 μbars = l.0 xl06 dyn/cm2 = 1.0 xl05 Pa.
Some examples of sound-intensity in air, referenced to 10-16 W/m2, are:
(1) The threshold of painful sound is 130 dB, or about 0.009 lbf/in2.
(2) The subway-express passing the station emits 102 dB, or about 0.0004 lbf/in2.
(3) Normal conversational speech at one meter is 70 dB, or about 0.000009 lbf/in2.
(4) A quiet whisper heard at five feet is 18 dB, or about 0.00000002 lbf/in2.
Notably, it is painful to feel (sense) a change in pressure on your ear drum of 9/1000th of pound per square inch.
For a denser media, no pun intended, consider seawater at 15 degrees Centigrade, and a salinity of 36 ppt, parts per thousand, which equates to a Specific Gravity, also a unit-less ratio, of 1.025; such that,
Density, ρo seawater = 1.025 g/cm3; and,
Speed of Sound, c seawater = 1.505 x l05 cm/s; such that,
Acoustical Impedance, ρo∙c seawater = 1.5426 x 105 dyn∙s/cm3, at 15oC, and so = 36 ppt.

 Discernibly, the acoustical impedance of seawater, ρo∙cseawater, is about 3600 times greater than ρo∙cair; in that, (1.5426x l05) ÷ (4.2860 x 101) ≈ 3600:
10log10 [3600] = 35.5630 ≈ +36 dB ref ρ∙c air “up” from air.

In that the speed of sound, c, varies directly with the density of the medium, the acoustical impedance varies accordingly. Notably, if the same sound-pressure, p air, is applied in seawater as intensely as it was in air, then the corresponding SIL seawater will be more due to the greater acoustical impedance in the denser medium.
Notably, the sound in seawater will be +36 dBref ρ0∙c air “louder” than it was in air. Thus, sound-intensities in different media vary directly with the characteristic acoustical impedance of the propagating medium, ρc ref medium. And, for example, the SPL air of normal conversational speech heard at 4 feet, or about 120 cm, is 0.645 dyn/cm2, therefore:
SIL air = 10log10 [((0.645 dyn/cm2)2 ÷ (42.86 dyn∙s/cm3)) x10-7)] -10log10 [10-16 W/m2]
≈ [(-4 dB) –(16 dB) –70 dB] -[-160 dB] = 70 dB ref 10-16 W/m2.
If that same sound-pressure of 0.645 dyn/cm2 in air is applied in seawater, then for a SIL seawater, a SIL ref for that denser medium must be referenced to the MAF in air, such that:
IMAF seawater = ((0.0002dyn/cm2)2 ÷ (ρo∙cseawater)) x10-7)
= ((4.0×10-8) ÷ (1.5426xl05)) x10-7)
= 2.5930 x10-20 ≈ 2.6 x10-20 W/m2; and,
SILseawater = 10log10 [((0.645)2 ÷ (ρo∙cair)) x10-7] – 10log10 [2.6 x10-20 W/m2]
= 10log10[((4.160 x10-1) ÷ (1.5426xl05)) x10-7mo)] – 10log10 [2.6 x10-20 W/m2]
≈ [(-4 dB) –(2 +50 dB) +(-70 dB)] – [4 -200 dB] = 70 dB ref 2.6 x 10-20 W/m2.
Albeit the dB levels are the same, the references are different, that is, ref 2.6 x10-20 W/m2in seawater, differs from ref 10-16 W/m2in air, and therefore, one deduces that the human ear is better suited for sensing Sounds in the Air than it is for Sounds in the Sea. Neither is the comparison below veritable, in that the minimum sound-pressure level sensed by the human ear in air is not comparable to the “zeroed” reference level for a modern ceramic transducer in seawater:
SPL air = 20 log10 [0.645 dyn/cm2] -20 log10 [0.0002 dyn/cm2] ≈ [-4 dB] – [-74 dB]
= 70 dB ref 0.0002 dyn/cm2 = 70 dB ref 20 μPa; and,
SPLseawater = 20 log10 [0.0645 Pa] -20log10 [1 x10-6 Pa]
= [(-24 dB) –(-120 dB)] = 96 dB ref 1 μPa, the difference of the references.
With respect to the sensitivity of the acoustical receptor, consider that an earlier design of a magnetostriction electro-acoustic transducer, a la a hydrophone, could be “zeroed” to 1 dyn/cm2@4ft as its pref in seawater. In comparison, today’s electrostriction electro-acoustic ceramic transducers can be “zeroed” to 1 μPa, which is 100000 times more sensitive, in that, 1 dyn/cm2 = 0.1 Pa = 1 x10-5 μPa, a technological advance of +50 dB ref 1 dyn/cm2.

Summation– with an example. Our binaural hearing system has a low threshold for sensing acoustic energy levels—within our sonic frequency-band. Moreover, we can discern relatively small changes in those incoming acoustic levels.
Patently, by advances in modern technology, ceramic electrostriction-transducers coupled with powerful digital-signal processors have much lower detection thresholds than we do just hearing through our ears; and, can discern much smaller increments of level-changes.
Some say, perhaps for marketing hype, that their hearing-assisted amplification devices can sense, “hear,” a sparrow’s heartbeat across the street. Nonetheless, there are devices that can “hear” normal conversation inside a room from across the street—or, from a helicopter patrolling overhead.
In regard to measurement, it is somewhat more difficult [more $$$] to measure changes in sound-intensity, or sound-power levels, and record the SIL in dB for the respective I, than it is to measure changes in sound-pressure, and simply note the SPL in dB as indicated on the meter-face for the impinging p. Similarly, dB can be measured for reciprocatory transducer voltages, as referenced to the electro-mechanical measuring instrument’s “zeroed” setting for a MDS.
 Practically, SPL in dB is the preferred measurement for Sounds in the Sea.
To close with an intriguing example of a somewhat foreboding man-made sound …in the Sea, consider a coal-oil powered [diesel-electric] submarine-warship running submerged at about 200 feet making 170 RPM [≈8 knots]—and, radiating broadband noise from water-cavitations caused by the thrashing rotation of the ship’s propulsion screws.
Markedly though, the processed sound-pressure spectrum peaks at about 28 dB ref 1 dyn/cm2@ 4 ft, and is centered around 1-kHz. This SPL dB equates to p seawater of 2.55 x 101 dyn/cm2. Its SIL dB is comparable to 102 dB ref 10-16 W/m2 in the air at the passenger-platform as the subway-express passes through the station; whereas, the I air for the subway-express is 1.58 x 10-6 W/cm2.
Notably, 102 dB ref 10-16 W/m2 is just -3 dB “down” from 105 dB ref 10-16 W/m2, the sound-intensity level at which the US Navy requires the donning of double-ear protection.
Q: Is that close enough for government work, or is it a doubling of the sound-intensity?
A: Well now, you know precisely how much that is, to wit: 2∙(1.6 x 10-16 W/m2). qed.

Most importantly: Always note the dB reference for Apple-to-Apple comparisons. ▄

“O, GOD, THY SEA IS SO GREAT,
AND MY BOAT IS SO SMALL.”

TABLE OF SOUND INTENSITIES.
[Note: For I W/m2 = p2/ρ0∙c air, where ρ1∙cair = 41.15 N∙s/m3; and, p ref = 1 dyn/cm2 @ 4 ft for SPL dB.]
Sound SIL dB I in p in SPL dB
Type ref 10-16 W/m2 W/m2 dyn/cm2 ref 1 dyn/cm2 @ 4ft
Saturn Rocket 194 2.4 x103 1.01 x106 120
Flight Deck Ops 140 1.0 x10-2 2.04 x103 66
Excruciating Pain 130 1.0 x10-3 6.45 x102 56
Missile Tube Vent 120 1.0 x10-4 2.04 x102 46
Rock Concert 115 3.2 x10-5 1.14 x102 41
Marine Diesel 110 1.0 x10-5 6.45 x101 36
Radial Saw 105 3.2 x10-6 3.68 x101 31
Subway Express 102 1.6 x10-6 2.55 x101 28
Paint Chipper 100 1.0 x10-6 2.04 x101 26
Lawn Mower 95 3.2 x10-7 1.14 x101 21
Niagara Falls 92 1.6 x10-7 8.08 x100 18
Shouted Speech 90 1.0 x10-7 6.45 x100 16
Forklift 85 3.2 x10-6 3.68 x100 11
Conversation 70 1.0 x10-9 6.45 x10-1 -4
Average Office 55 3.2 x10-11 1.14 x10-1 -19
Average Home 40 1.0 x10-12 2.04 x10-2 -34
Rustling Leaves 20 1.0 x10-14 2.04 x10-3 -54
Quiet Whisper 18 6.3 x10-15 1.62 x10-3 -56
MAF reference level 0 1.0 x10-16 2.00 x10-4 -74
Sample Calculations:
SIL dB = 10log10 [1.6 x 10-6 W/cm2] –10log10 [1 x 10-16] ≈ [+2 dB -60 dB] –[-160 dB] = 102 dB ref 10-16 W/m2.
SPL dB = 20 log10 [2.55 x 101 dyn/cm2] -10 log10 [1 dyn/cm2] ≈ [+8 dB +20 dB] –[0 dB] = 28 dB ref 1 dyn/cm2 @ 4ft.
P W/mo2 = p2 ÷ ρ1∙cair = [(2.55 x 101 dyn/cm2)2 x 10-3 x 10-4] ÷ [(41.1551 N∙s/m3)] = 1.580 W/m2; where,
ρ1∙cair = 41.1551 N∙s/m3 is for the extant air-density in the subway-express station at the time of measurement.


Sign Up For ATI Courses eNewsletter

Rating 3.00 out of 5
[?]

, , , , ,

3 Comments

Is US The Hottest Place On Earth? Yes, it is!

More precisely it definitely was in the month of July 2011 according to NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL).

On average the temperatures were 20 degrees Fahrenheit higher than normal. This led to the deaths of dozens of citizen.
NASA AIRS (Atmoshperic Infrared Shounder) movies below show the heat wave evolution.
Click on an individual image for the movie

figure 1 for PIA14480 figure 2 for PIA14480
figure 3 for PIA14480
figure 4 for PIA14480
Surface Air Temp
Daytime
Surface Skin Temp
Daytime
Surface Air Temp
Nighttime
Surface Skin Temp
Nighttime

The movies demonstrate surface air temperature and surface skin temperature, during both daytime and nighttime conditions.

What is surface air temperature?

It is something we experience whenever we go outside. High surface air temperature makes even shady places feel hot.

What is Surface skin temperature?

It is  is what we feel when we touch the ground.

What is the difference between the daytime and nighttime temperature?

During daytime, the surface skin temperature is generally much warmer than surface air temperature because dark surfaces are so effective at absorbing sunlight. The surface air and skin temperatures are related by something invisible but actually quite familiar: infrared — or heat — radiation. Our skin is very sensitive to infrared radiation, making a sun-heated wall feel warm even from a few feet away after sunset. Air absorbs very little sunlight, but easily absorbs infrared radiation emitted by the warm surface. It’s the sun-warmed surface — not sunlight — that heats the air during daytime.

What are your survival techniques for this hot summer?  Please comment below…

 


Sign Up For ATI Courses eNewsletter

Rating 3.00 out of 5
[?]

, , , , , , ,

No Comments

Unexplained Noises in Homes

The blog listed below tracks and encourages descriptions of unexplained noises that suddenly appear in homes. Written by home owners, they provide information for researchers to study and hopefully understand the physics enough to provide advice to mitigate the problems. Problems include both low frequency Hum and high frequency related to recent WiFi installations.
“Victims across the country are being impacted by this noise.  We hope this blog will be a source of information and comfort, knowing, you are not alone; there are thousands of others who .   We will continue to fight Corporate America to right this injustice they are inflicting on us all.  Remember, even if your neighbor is not aware of the noise; they too, are absorbing the effects of this noise and radiation, as well.”

Sign Up For ATI Courses eNewsletter

Rating 4.00 out of 5
[?]

, ,

1 Comment

Are the astronauts having sex in space? What do we know and think.

It is a known fact that the question of sex in space bothered quite a good percentage of Earth’s population for a long time now.  The human species are sexual by nature.  We have been sending our astronauts to space for 50 years now.  So, here are the main questions:

 

 

  1. Have the most basic human act been performed in space?
  2. If “yes”, than by whom?
  3. How would that work?
  4. Can a human child be conceived?

The below are the answers we were able to find

  1. According to former astronaut Leroy Chiao the answer is “No” for American space fliers and also “No” for Russian cosmonauts according to Valery Bogomolov, the deputy director of the Moscow-based Institute of Biomedical Problems.
  2. Past discussions often included attempts to determine the veracity of speculations (e.g., about the STS-47 mission, on which married astronauts Mark C. Lee and Jan Davis flew), and even hoaxes, such as Document 12-571-3570 Also, there were romantic dramas back on Earth, for instance William Oefelein and Lisa Nowak. Nowak was arrested in 2007 for allegedly attacking a woman she viewed as a rival for Oefelein’s affections.
  3. The primary issue to be considered in off-Earth reproduction is the lack of a 1G gravitational field.  However, Vanna Bonta invented a 2Suite (see pic above), designed to facilitate effortless intimacy in the weightless environments such as outer space, or on planets with low gravity.
  4. Studies conducted on reproduction of mammals in microgravity include experiments with rats.

Although the fetus developed properly, the rats that developed in microgravity lacked the ability to right themselves. Another study examined mouse embryo fertilization in microgravity. Although both groups resulted in healthy mice, the authors noted that the growth rate was slower for the embryos fertilized in microgravity than for those in normal gravity.

Please share your views on the subjects by posting your comments below.

 

 


Sign Up For ATI Courses eNewsletter

Rating 4.00 out of 5
[?]

, , , , , ,

No Comments

GIS (Geographic Information Systems) software is used to help Japan

After Tohuku earthquake and tsunami, Japan is in a great need for GIS maps to help coordinate the relief effort. Emergency Mapping Team (EMT) has volunteered to supply GIS maps that can beenhanced with other information like shelters, highway traffic, infrastructure and more. The maps are available on EMT website in static and dynamic form. Some of the maps available are: Evacuation Zone for buildings around Fukushima Neclear Power Plant, Rolling Blackout of Tokyo, Area of disaster relief, Facilities for people in need of aid, damage of buildings, etc.

Several organizations are involved with EMT: Esri, ESRI Japan Corporation, Honda Motor, Pioneer, and more.

Esri is a software development and services company providing Geographic Information System (GIS) software and geodatabase management applications. The headquarters of Esri is inRedlands, California.

The company was founded as Environmental Systems Research Institute in 1969 as a land-use consulting firm. Esri products (particularly ArcGIS Desktop) have one-third of the global market share. In 2009 Esri had approximately a 30 percent share of the GIS software market worldwide, more than any other vendor. Other sources estimate that about seventy percent of the current GIS users make use of Esri products.

Read more here: http://www.gpsworld.com/gis/emergency-management/news/emergency-mapping-team-supplies-resources-japan-disaster-11511?utm_source=GSS&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=GeoIntelligence_04_10_2011&utm_content=emergency-mapping-team-supplies-resources-japan-disaster-11511


Sign Up For ATI Courses eNewsletter

Rating 3.00 out of 5
[?]

, , , , , ,

1 Comment

Top Five ATI YouTube Videos for 2010

Video Clip: Click to Watch
ATI specializes in short course technical training

Our mission here at the Applied Technology Institute (ATI) is to provide expert training and the highest quality professional development in space, communications, defense, sonar, radar, and signal processing. We are not a one-size-fits-all educational facility. Our short classes include both introductory and advanced courses

Our website (ATI Courses) contains many online tutorials on technical topics. For example, hyper-spectral (& multi-spectral) imaging, radar, space communications, Rockets 101, GPS and along with even more subjects are covered. Check it out for yourself here

ATI Top YouTube Videos for 2010

The five videos below were our most viewed offerings on YouTube in 2010.

SATELLITE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING COURSE VIDEO

This three-day course is designed for satellite communications engineers, spacecraft engineers, and managers who want to obtain an understanding of the “big picture” of satellite communications. Each topic is illustrated by detailed worked numerical examples, using published data for actual satellite communications systems. The course is technically oriented and includes mathematical derivations of the fundamental equations. It will enable the participants to perform their own satellite link budget calculations. The course will especially appeal to those whose objective is to develop quantitative computational skills in addition to obtaining a qualitative familiarity with the basic concepts.

For more information see Satellite Communications Systems Engineering Course

Or see a slide sampler for the Satellite Communications Systems Engineering Course

FUNDAMENTALS OF RADAR TECHNOLOGY SHORT COURSE VIDEO

A three-day course covering the basics of radar, taught in a manner for true understanding of the fundamentals, even for the complete newcomer. Covered are electromagnetic waves, frequency bands, the natural phenomena of scattering and propagation, radar performance calculations and other tools used in radar work, and a “walk through” the four principal subsystems – the transmitter, the antenna, the receiver and signal processor, and the control and interface apparatus – covering in each the underlying principle and componentry. A few simple exercises reinforce the student’s understanding. Both surface-based and airborne radars are addressed.

For more information, please see ATI’s Fundamentals of Radar course.

ATI RADAR SIGNAL ANALYSIS AND PROCESSING USING MATLAB VIDEO

This three-day course develops the technical background needed to predict and understand the factors controlling the performance of radar systems including anti-clutter and anti-jamming signal processing techniques. The course introduces the fundamental concepts and properties of various techniques without the necessity of a detailed analytic background.

For more information, please see ATI’s Radar Signal Analysis and Processing using MATLAB course.

MULTI-TARGET TRACKING AND MULTI-SENSOR DATA FUSION SHORT COURSE VIDEO

The objective of this course is to introduce engineers, scientists, managers, and military operations personnel to the fields of radar tracking, data fusion and to the key technologies which are available today for application to this field. The course is designed to be rigorous where appropriate, while remaining accessible to students without a specific scientific background in this field. The course will start from the fundamentals and move to advanced concepts. This course will identify and characterize the principal components of typical tracking systems. A variety of techniques for addressing different aspects of the tracking data fusion problem will be described. For example, different techniques are required for the assimilation of “time-late” data than those used for “real-time” data. Real world examples of data fusion systems used by both the Navy and the Marines will be presented and discussed. This course will also use specific illustrative examples to show the tradeoffs and systems issues between the applications of different techniques.

For more information, please see ATI’s Multi-Target Tracking and Multi-Sensor Data Fusion course.

GPS TECHNOLOGY COURSE VIDEO

The Global Positioning System (GPS) is a vital national resource. Over the past thirty years it has made the transition from concept to reality, representing today an operational system on which the entire world has become dependent. To learn more about GPS, check out one of our courses below.

Nearly every military vehicle and every satellite that flies into space uses the GPS to fix its position. In this popular four-day short course, GPS expert Tom Logsdon will describe in detail how those precise radionavigation systems work and review the many practical benefits they provide to military and civilian users in space and around the globe.

Each student will receive a new personal GPS Navigator with a multi-channel capability. Through practical demonstration you will learn how the receiver works, how to operate it in various situations, and how to interpret the positioning solutions it provides.

For more information, please see ATI’s GPS Technology course.

Or see ATI’s GPS Technology Technical Training Short Course Sampler

Course Outline, Samplers, and Notes

Determine for yourself the value of these or our other courses before you sign up. See our samples (See Slide Samples) on some of our courses.

Or check out the new ATI channel on YouTube.

After attending the course you will receive a full set of detailed notes from the class for future reference, as well as a certificate of completion. To see the complete course listing from ATI, click on the links at the bottom of the page.

Please visit our website for more valuable information.

About ATI and the Instructors

Since 1984, ATI has provided leading-edge public courses and onsite technical training to DoD and NASA personnel, as well as contractors. ATI short courses are designed to help you keep your professional knowledge up-to-date.

Our courses provide you a practical overview of space and defense technologies which provide a strong foundation for understanding the issues that must be confronted in the use, regulation and development such complex systems.

Our short courses are designed for individuals involved in planning, designing, building, launching, and operating space and defense systems. Whether you are a busy engineer, a technical expert or a project manager, you can enhance your understanding of complex systems in a short time. You will also become aware of the basic vocabulary essential to interact meaningfully with your colleagues.

ATI’s instructors are world-class experts who are the best in the business. They are carefully selected for their ability to clearly explain advanced technology.


Sign Up For ATI Courses eNewsletter

Rating 3.00 out of 5
[?]

, , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

ATI Specializes in Short Course Technical Training

Video Clip: Click to Watch

Our mission here at the Applied Technology Institute (ATI) is to provide expert training and the highest quality professional development in space, communications, defense, sonar, radar, and signal processing. We are not a one-size-fits-all educational facility. Our short classes include both introductory and advanced courses.

Our website (ATI Courses) contains many online tutorials on technical topics. For example, hyper-spectral (& multi-spectral) imaging, radar, space communications, Rockets 101, GPS and along with even more subjects are covered. Check it out for yourself here.

ATI Top SlideShare Tutorials for 2010

The five tutorials below were our most viewed offerings on SlideShare in 2010.

CERTIFIED SYSTEMS ENGINEERING PROFESSIONAL (CSEP) PREPARATION COURSE

This two-day course walks through the Certified Systems Engineering Professional (CSEP) requirements and the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) Handbook to cover all topics that might be on the CSEP exam. Interactive work, study plans, and sample examination questions help you to prepare effectively for the exam. Participants leave the course with solid knowledge, a hard copy of the INCOSE Handbook, study plans, and a sample examination.

The INCOSE CSEP rating is a useful and coveted milestone in the career of a systems engineer, demonstrating knowledge, education and experience that is of high value to systems organizations. The certification requires passing an extensive examination based on the INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook v3.2. This course provides you with the detailed knowledge and practice that you need to pass the CSEP examination.

See CSEP Slide Samples.

See a sample of the CSEP Preparation Course on YouTube.

TACTICAL MISSILE DESIGN COURSE & SYSTEMS ENGINEERING

This three-day short course covers the fundamentals of tactical missile design, development, and system engineering. The course provides a system-level, integrated method for missile aerodynamic configuration/propulsion design and analysis. It addresses the broad range of alternatives in meeting cost and performance requirements. The methods presented are generally simple closed-form analytical expressions that are physics-based, to provide insight into the primary driving parameters. Configuration sizing examples are presented for rocketpowered, ramjet-powered, and turbo-jet powered baseline missiles. Typical values of missile parameters and the characteristics of current operational missiles are discussed as well as the enabling subsystems and technologies for tactical missiles and the current/projected state-of-the-art. Daily roundtable discussion. Videos illustrate missile development activities and missile performance. Finally, each attendee will design, build, and fly a small air powered rocket.

See a course sampler here.

ADVANCED TOPICS IN DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSING (DSP) COURSE

This four-day course is designed for communication systems engineers, programmers, implementers and managers who need to understand current practice and next generation DSP techniques for upcoming communication systems. DSP is more than mapping legacy analog designs to a DSP implementation. To avoid compromise solution appropriate for an earlier time period, we return to first principles to learn how to apply new technology capabilities to the design of next generation communication systems. Students will receive a copy of the instructor’s textbook, Multirate Signal Processing for Communication Systems.

See a DSP course sampler here.

SONAR PRINCIPLES ASW ANALYSIS COURSE

This course provides an excellent introduction to underwater sound and highlights how sonar principles are employed in ASW analyses. The course provides a solid understanding of the sonar equation and discusses in-depth propagation loss, target strength, reverberation, arrays, array gain, and detection of signals.

Physical insight and typical results are provided to help understand each term of the sonar equation. The instructors then show how the sonar equation can be used to perform ASW analysis and predict the performance of passive and active sonar systems. The course also reviews the rationale behind current weapons and sensor systems and discusses directions for research in response to the quieting of submarine signatures.

The course is valuable to engineers and scientists who are entering the field or as a review for employees who want a system level overview. The lectures provide the knowledge and perspective needed to understand recent developments in underwater acoustics and in ASW. A comprehensive set of notes and the textbook Principles of Underwater Sound will be provided to all attendees.

See a SONAR course sampler here.

SATELLITE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING COURSE

This three-day course is designed for satellite communications engineers, spacecraft engineers, and managers who want to obtain an understanding of the “big picture” of satellite communications. Each topic is illustrated by detailed worked numerical examples, using published data for actual satellite communications systems. The course is technically oriented and includes mathematical derivations of the fundamental equations. It will enable the participants to perform their own satellite link budget calculations. The course will especially appeal to those whose objective is to develop quantitative computational skills in addition to obtaining a qualitative familiarity with the basic concepts.

See a sample of the Satellite Communications Systems Engineering Course on YouTube.

See a slide sampler for the Satellite Communications Systems Engineering Course.

Course Outline, Samplers, and Notes

Determine for yourself the value of these or our other courses before you sign up. See our samples (See Slide Samples) on some of our courses.

Or check out the new ATI channel on YouTube.

After attending the course you will receive a full set of detailed notes from the class for future reference, as well as a certificate of completion. To see the complete course listing from ATI, click on the links at the bottom of the page.

Please visit our website for more valuable information.

About ATI and the Instructors

Since 1984, ATI has provided leading-edge public courses and onsite technical training to DoD and NASA personnel, as well as contractors. ATI short courses are designed to help you keep your professional knowledge up-to-date.

Our courses provide you a practical overview of space and defense technologies which provide a strong foundation for understanding the issues that must be confronted in the use, regulation and development such complex systems.

Our short courses are designed for individuals involved in planning, designing, building, launching, and operating space and defense systems. Whether you are a busy engineer, a technical expert or a project manager, you can enhance your understanding of complex systems in a short time. You will also become aware of the basic vocabulary essential to interact meaningfully with your colleagues.

ATI’s instructors are world-class experts who are the best in the business. They are carefully selected for their ability to clearly explain advanced technology.

Times, Dates, and Locations

For the times, dates and locations of all of our short courses, please visit ATI Schedule of Short Courses.

Rating 3.00 out of 5
[?]

, , , ,

No Comments

Fully Submersible Submarines Are Used For Drug Trafficking

On February 14, 2011 Columbian authorities seized a fully submersible submarine that was used for drag trafficking.  The sub was found about 275 miles  southwest of Bogota.  Sub was equipped with two diesel engines and air conditioning and was made to carry the crew of 6.  The vessel had the capacity to sail all the way to Mexico without surfacing once.  This sub is the first of its kind.  Only semi-submersible submarines were found previosly.  Read more here.


Sign Up For ATI Courses eNewsletter

Rating 3.00 out of 5
[?]

, , , ,

No Comments

Are animal gradually change the frequency of their calls in response to urban noise?

Lombard effect (described by Etienne Lombard in 1911) has been used to describe an increase in amplitude of a call or vocalization. When you come home from a loud party you usually have a sore throat from yelling all night. The Lombard effect has been observed in zebra finches, Japanese quail, blue-throated hummingbirds, the common marmoset, beluga whales, orcas, manatees, humans and many other species.

However, Lombard effect is only really useful for getting over short-term noisiness. With development of technology and industry the noise never seizes.

To get around yelling all the time, or calling longer, some animals gradually change the frequency of their calls. The North Atlantic right whale, for example usually sends its signals at low frequencies, from 40-400Hz. That’s the same region effected by shipping noise. (Try hearing the right whale’s characteristic up-call through all the traffic). So to get around it, the whales first increased the amplitude of its call to keep in touch with other whales during loud periods. Eventually though, the whales started calling at higher frequencies, to escape the shipping noise.

Read more here.

Rating 3.00 out of 5
[?]

, ,

No Comments

An Engineer Joke

The optimist says the glass is half full.
The pessimist says the glass is half empty.

What does the engineer say?

The glass is twice as big as it needs to be!

Rating 3.00 out of 5
[?]

No Comments