Archive for category General

RFPs and RFIs: Do You Know What to Always Include and What Should Never Be Included?

Video Clip: Click to Watch
How to build solid RFIs and RFPs for complicated systems,

which will maximize the number of highly qualified bidders

This three-day course on proposal writing is designed for engineers, scientists, project managers and other professionals who design, build, test, buy or sell complex systems. Each topic is illustrated by real-world case studies discussed by experienced system development and acquisition professionals. Key topics are reinforced with small-team exercises. Over two hundred pages of sample Requests for Proposal (RFP) and Requests for Information (RFI) and are provided. Students assess real RFIs and RFPs in class using checklists and templates provided

Since 1984, the Applied Technology Institute (ATI) has provided leading-edge public courses and onsite technical training to DoD and NASA personnel, as well as contractors. Whether you are a busy engineer, a technical expert or a project manager, you can enhance your understanding of complex systems in a short time.

You will become aware of the basic vocabulary essential to interact meaningfully with your colleagues. If you or your team are in need of more technical training, then boost your career with the knowledge needed to provide better, faster, and cheaper solutions for sophisticated DoD and NASA systems.

Why not take a short course? ATI short courses are less than a week long and are designed to help you keep your professional knowledge up-to-date. Our courses provide a practical overview of space and defense technologies which provide a strong foundation for understanding the issues that must be confronted in the use, regulation and development of complex systems. 

What You Will Learn From This Course:

  • What are Requests for Proposal (RFP)?
  • How do they differ from Requests for Information (RFI)?
  • How can they help us cost-effectively buy robust systems that meet not only the specification but also meet the needs and expectations of the end users?
  • What makes “good” RFIs and RFPs?
  • What should always be included and what should never be included in them?
  • What is the one item that, if missing from the RFP, will ensure no reputable firm will bid the job?
  • What is the one thing that inexperienced RFP writers inadvertently do that guts the competitiveness (only one company will bid) and practically guarantees protests of any contract award?
  • What RFP components and features will attract the most qualified bidders?

Course Outline, Samplers, and Notes

BUILDING SOLID REQUESTS FOR PROPOSALS

After taking this course you will be able to write solid RFPs and RFIs and you will know how a well-crafted one is organized, structured, designed and built by an acquisition/procurement enterprise (either government or a contractor).

After attending the course you will receive a full set of detailed notes at the beginning of the class for future reference and can add notes and more detail based on the in-class interaction, as well as a certificate of completion. Please visit our website for more valuable information.

About ATI and the Instructors

Our mission here at ATI is to provide expert training and the highest quality professional development in space, communications, defense, sonar, radar, and signal processing. We are not a one-size-fits-all educational facility. Our short classes include both introductory and advanced courses.

ATI’s instructors are world-class experts who are the best in the business. They are carefully selected for their ability to clearly explain advanced technology.

Mack McKinney, president and founder of a consulting company, has worked in the defense industry since 1975, first as an Air Force officer for eight years, then with Westinghouse Defense and Northrop Grumman for 16 years, then with a SIGINT company in NY for six years. He now teaches, consults and writes Concepts of Operations for Boeing, Sikorsky, Lockheed Martin Skunk Works, Raytheon Missile Systems, Joint Forces Command and all the uniformed services. He has US patents in radar processing and hyperspectral sensing.

Dates and Locations

The dates and locations of this short course are below:

Jan 31-Feb 2, 2012        Virginia Beach, VA

May 1-3, 2012                  Virginia Beach, VA

 

Rating 3.00 out of 5
[?]

No Comments

This Maybe One Class You WANT to Blow Up in Your Face Monday, November 07, 2011

At ATI, the course IS the Bomb!!!
Video Clip: Click to Watch
Do you know how to evaluate the performance and vulnerability of explosives and propellants?

This four-day course is designed for scientists, engineers and managers interested in the current state of explosive and propellant technology. After an introduction to shock waves, the current explosive technology is described. Numerical methods for evaluating explosive and propellant sensitivity to shock waves are described and applied to vulnerability problems such as projectile impact and burning to detonation

This course is suited for scientists, engineers, and managers interested in the current state of explosive and propellant technology, and in the use of numerical modeling to evaluate the performance and vulnerability of explosives and propellants

Since 1984, the Applied Technology Institute (ATI) has provided leading-edge public courses and onsite technical training to DoD and NASA personnel, as well as contractors. Whether you are a busy engineer, a technical expert or a project manager, you can enhance your understanding of complex systems in a short time. You will become aware of the basic vocabulary essential to interact meaningfully with your colleagues.

If you are in need of more technical training, why not take a short course?

ATI short courses are less than a week long and are designed to help you keep your professional knowledge up-to-date. You can boost your career with the strong foundation for understanding the issues that must be confronted in the use and regulation of explosives and propellants.

Course Outline, Samplers, and Notes

Click on the course title below for more information.

ATI’S EXPLOSIVES TECHNOLOGY & MODELING COURSE

Click here now to see for yourself the value of this course before you sign up.

What you will learn when you take this course:

  • What are Shock Waves and Detonation Waves?
  • What makes an Explosive Hazardous?
  • Where Shock Wave and Explosive Data is available
  • How to model Explosive and Propellant Performance
  • How to model Explosive Hazards and Vulnerability
  • How to use the furnished explosive performance and hydrodynamic codes
  • The current state of explosive and propellant technology

Participants will receive a copy of Numerical Modeling of Explosives and Propellants, Third Edition by Dr. Charles Mader, 2008 CRC Press. In addition, participants will receive an updated CD-ROM.

About ATI and the Instructors

Our mission here at ATI is to provide expert training and the highest quality professional development in space, communications, defense, sonar, radar, and signal processing. We are not a one-size-fits-all educational facility. Our short classes include both introductory and advanced courses.

ATI’s instructors are world-class experts who are the best in the business. They are carefully selected for their ability to clearly explain advanced technology.

Charles L. Mader, Ph.D., is a retired Fellow of the Los Alamos National Laboratory and President consulting company. Dr. Mader authored the monograph Numerical Modeling of Detonation, and also wrote four dynamic material property data volumes published by the University of California Press. His book and CD-ROM entitled Numerical Modeling of Explosives and Propellants, Third Edition, published in 2008 by CRC Press will be the text for the course. He is the author of Numerical Modeling of Water Waves, Second Edition, published in 2004 by CRC Press. He is listed in Who’s Who in America and Who’s Who in the World. He has consulted and guest lectured for public and private organizations in several countries.

Dates and Locations

The next dates and locations of this course are as follows:

December 12-15, 2011 Albuquerque, NM

September, 2012 MD/VA Area

 

Rating 3.00 out of 5
[?]

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

ATI Wishes You a Happy Halloween!

Video Clip: Click to Watch
Scary is NOT taking one of ATI’s Short Technical Classes



Going back to school does not have to be terrifying like Halloween is. Just you and several like-minded professionals learning from a world class ghoul who loves to teach. Our short courses are designed for individuals involved in planning, designing, building, launching, and operating today’s frighteningly complex systems.

The Applied Technology Institute (ATI) is not a one-size-fits-all educational facility. Our short classes include both introductory and advanced courses. Whether you are a busy engineer, a wicked witch or a project manager, you can enhance your understanding of scary space and defense systems in a short time. You will also become aware of the basic vocabulary essential to interact meaningfully with your disturbing colleagues.

Course Outline, Samplers, and Notes

Determine for yourself the value of our creepy courses before you sign up.

See our samples (See Slide Samples) on some of our courses.

Or check out the new ATI channel on YouTube.

After attending the course you will receive a full set of detailed notes in blood from the class for future reference, as well as a certificate of completion. Please visit our website for more ghoulish information.

About ATI and the Instructors

ATI’s instructors are world-class experts who are the best in the business. They are carefully selected for their ability to clearly explain eerie and advanced technology. Our mission here at ATI is to provide expert training and the highest quality professional development in terrifying space, communications, defense, sonar, radar systems.

Dates and Locations

For the dates and locations of all of our short courses, please rattle the chains (links) below.

Sincerely,

The ATI Courses Team

P.S. Call today for registration at 410-956-8805 or 888-501-2100 or access our website at www.ATIcourses.com. For general questions or inquisitions please email us at ATI@ATIcourses.com

or

Join, Link, Follow or Share with us at:

Join us on Facebook

Link to us on LinkedIn

Follow us on Twitter

Share with us on Slideshare

P.P.S. What Happens at ATI does NOT Stay at ATI because our training helps you and your organization remain competitive in this changing and often horrifying world. Please feel free to call Mr. Jenkins personally to discuss your requirements and objectives. He will be glad to explain in gory detail what ATI can do for you, what it will cost, and what you can expect in results and future performance.

Rating 3.00 out of 5
[?]

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

No Comments

A touch of madness

Madness! Madness!!

Last two words spoken
“Bridge over the River Kwai”

Sane was the watchword

In several posts, I’ve made the point that the passionless rationalist will often find it hard to reach a decision. They are wrapped up in the paralysis of analysis–they keep going over all the data and all the alternatives and never reach a consensus–with others or with themselves–on what to do.

My contention, said by many others as well, is that it takes a dose of passion for a vision to break the analysis cycle and reach a decision. And, note this: the passionate have stickiness–once decided, it’s hard-to-impossible to move someone off their position.

How many times, on a big decision, have you had an instinctive feeling: this is the right thing to do!  Once felt, there’s no more paralysis and there’s no more dithering.

That stickiness we spoke of is an elixir to  the follower community: Yes! the leadership knows where we need to get to; there will be certainty and willingness to put it on the line to get there.

Now, I’ve also written about innovation, and the role leadership plays inspiring the creative to innovate something new to the world.

Along comes a touch of madness

But what luck! Now we learn that there’s something that ties leadership and innovation together–something unique when a leader is both inspirational and innovative. In a book that ties it all together, it turns out that truly inspired and innovative leadership have a common root: it is the byproduct of mental disorder and mild manic depression. Who knew? In a stroke (no pun), we’ve now got the whole picture!

In a new book, author Nassir Ghaemi explains in “A First-Rate Madness: Uncovering the Links Between Leadership and Mental Illness” that some of our best and brightest are just a little mad. Is this surprising?

Perhaps not.  But Steven Colbert was particularly insightful when he asked whether we should be worried that a madman may have his finger on the button (even if only the project button).  Ghaemi said: “That’s one way of putting it”.  But in his telling, benefits outweigh risks.

God, I hope he’s right!

This is a guest blog post by John Goodpasture. John is an ATI instructor who teaches two Systems Engineering courses:

Agile Project Management
Quantitative Methods: Bridging System Engineering


Sign Up For ATI Courses eNewsletter

Rating 3.00 out of 5
[?]

, , , , , , ,

No Comments

Not so Goodnight Irene: Tree Totals Lisa’s Home

The sound woke Nicholas and Lisa Badart just after 3 a.m. Sunday, Aug. 28. You know Lisa as the course registrar for Applied Technology Institute.

“I heard this rumble, and then a creaking noise, and I was half asleep, and I thought, ‘Oh no,’ and the whole roof came in,” said Nick Badart.

Seconds later the family was trapped by their champion ash tree. It was the second largest white ash in the country with a 9 foot diameter. Whipped by the heavy overnight winds of Hurricane Irene, and destabilized because of saturated soil, the award-winning, 300-year-old ash tree in the front yard of Badart’s historic home in the Lawyer’s Hill area of Elkridge had uprooted – and came smashing into the second-story bedroom.

Lisa was pinned to the bed, under the ceiling fan, surrounded by drywall, insulation, and 4” x 6” beams from the ceiling. Lisa realized that 2 feet or so from the edge of the bed was one trunk of the prize winning ash and the roof and ceiling were gone. If it had shifted about 3 foot feet, it would have been fatal. Lisa couldn’t move at first, because the fan was on top of her. Wind and rain came swirling into the room.


Cell phones and flashlights. You gotta love them. Lisa called 911. Rescue was there within 15 minutes. They had to signal with flashlights to determine where each group was located. The rescue personnel had to crawl over and under the massive tree to free the Badarts. Fortunately the whole family, including two dogs and several cats, escaped with minor injuries.

Lisa said “ I’m as much a junkie for hurricane forecasting as anyone and had watched the satellite pics on The Weather Channel, local news, and NASA links (http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hurricanes/archives/2011/h2011_Irene.html) as Hurricane Irene moved her way toward the mid-Atlantic. Last Friday, “just to be safe” she made preparations in the ATI office “in case” something would prevent business as usual on Monday.” In fact, ATI was without power for 3 days. Lisa calmly worked on Monday from her temporary hotel suite checking emails and sending confirmation letters.

Repair of the house could take up to nine months. Periodically we will post updated pictures on the blog.

Rating 3.00 out of 5
[?]

, ,

No Comments

Big & Scary “Shady Rat”: Massive Cyber-Spying Operation. Are You In Danger?

Massive Cyber-Spying Operation was revealed by McAffee recently.

A map from the McAfee report showing locations of hacking victims.

Dubbed “Operation Shady Rat” , the effort took data from groups ranging from the United Nations to media organizations, the government of Taiwan and the International Olympic Committee, the study says.

The targeting of the IOC and the World Anti-Doping Agency, which were targeted around the 2008 Olympics – “potentially pointed a finger at a state actor behind the intrusions, because there is likely no commercial benefit to be earned from such hacks,” Alperovitch wrote. And it doesn’t take too much reading between the lines to conclude which nation he’s talking about. Vanity Fair, in its scoop on the report, quotes other security experts as saying the signs point to China.

So how does all of this fit in with recent attacks from Anonymous and Lulzsec? “These types of exploitations have occurred relentlessly for at least a half decade, and the majority of the recent disclosures in the last six months have, in fact, been a result of relatively unsophisticated and opportunistic exploitations for the sake of notoriety by loosely organized political hacktivist groups such as Anonymous and Lulzsec

See a rundown of the hacking victims.


Sign Up For ATI Courses eNewsletter

Rating 3.00 out of 5
[?]

, ,

No Comments

Should the world leaders go into space?

“Yes, they should”- says astronaut Scott Parazynski.   There have been about 515 human beings that have seen their planet from space and every single one of them states that the experience changes your life forever.  With NASA Shuttle Program closing the future of human space travel has been turned over to the private companies.  The most prominent of them are SpaceX, Blue Origin, Sierra Nevada Corp. and Boeing.  This makes a possibility of going up in space quite attainable for everybody.  As a matter of fact, there is a contest that was announced in celebration of Seattle’s Space Needle that one can enter and win a chance to go into suborbit.  Space Adventures Company will be responsible for designing a vehicle to take the winner of the Space Needle contest into space.  The estimated price of the vehicle is $110,000.  You can find the details on how to register here.

More importantly, if you were one of the lucky few, what would you see?

You can see on planet Earth is the sunrise or sunset which happens 16 times a day when you’re going around the Earth at 17,500 miles an hour, one orbit every 90 minutes, so half of that time you’re in sunlight and half you’re in darkness.

You see the sun rise from behind the earth and the full spectrum of light.

You come to realize that we are much closer to both our friends and those we call enemies than we think we are and humanity might be better served if we realized that, in the end, we’re all neighbors and perhaps, more importantly, members of the same human family.

While romantic phrases like the endless oceans sound nice on paper, the Earth is a very finite and relatively small world and the things we do have the power to affect it profoundly.

You can find more info here.

What do you think?  Please comment below…


Sign Up For ATI Courses eNewsletter

Rating 3.00 out of 5
[?]

, , , , , ,

No Comments

Do you want to win a trip to space? Here is your chance.

To celebrate the 50th anniversary of Seatle’s  Space Needle, it was announced that the formal contest will be held with the final winner going up to suborbit, with about 6 minutes of zero gravity.  This is once in a lifetime opportunity to see the Earth from space.  Many astronauts call this a truly life changing experience.

Since the final landing of the space shuttle the field of human space travel has been turned over to the private companies, one of which, Space Adventures, will be responsible for designing a vehicle to take the winner of the Space Needle contest into space.  The estimated price of the grand prize is $110,000.

What do you need to do to enter?

  1. Sign up to enter at the Space Needle’s website
  2. Be lucky to be the randomly selected 1,000 finalists
  3. Create a 1 minute video that shows why you are the best candidate
  4. Be the lucky one chosen by the public
  5. Pass the fitness aptitude test
  6. Go up in space

Sign Up For ATI Courses eNewsletter

Rating 3.00 out of 5
[?]

, , ,

1 Comment

THE DECIBEL [dB]

The decibel, abbreviated dB, is used to denote a ratio that is ten times, or “deci” times, a unit the “Bel,” as so named by its celebrated devisor whose name it bears, Alexander Graham Bell, the inventor of the telephone. The decibel, dB, thus became the commonly used unit of measure for expressing a change in power from an original setting to that being measured, that is to say, a dB is a relative power measurement.
Since dB expresses a dimension-less ratio between two power-levels, the caveat for the measurement is that it must be taken at the same point as the reference so as to have the same “acoustical impedance.” Whereas, acoustical impedance, symbolized ρ•c, is the product of the density, ρ, of the medium of propagation, and the speed, c, of sound in it.
The dB is therefore used to express a relative increase or decrease in acoustic power or pressure, and their corresponding electric power-levels, as a ratio with either a previous level or a specified standard, or a reference. Such reference typically is in the style of a minimum discernible signal, a MDS, at a sound receptor such as the human ear, whose minimum audible field, the MAF, for the human ear is referenced as 0 dB.
This MAF for the human ear has been measured by experimentation to be at an Intensity, I, of 1.0 x10-16 W/m2 expressed as a Power per unit Area, This equates to a minute pressure, p, of 2.0 x 10-4 dyn/cm2, which most often is expressed as ref 20μPa, whereas 20 micro-Pascals is a pressure in MKS units.
The smallest change in sound-power level, ΔP, the normal human ear can detect, or “sense,” is about 1 dB ref Po. More than likely, such hearing sensitivity was considered by Alexander Graham Bell as the minimum change to which all other sound should be referenced.
Thus, by definition, a decibel, 1 dB ref Po, is ten times the base-ten logarithm of a power ratio equal to the one-tenth root of ten. For instance, the power per unit area, the “Sound Intensity Level,” SIL, of a quiet whisper is measured to be 18 dB, that is, its “volume” was 18 dB above the MAF. If that particular volume-setting is increased in intensity by 25.9%, then by this convention it is said to be “up” 1 dB ref Po, where ref Po denotes the original setting 18 dB.
This widely acknowledged convention is shown below in notational form:
(The number of) dB ref Po = 19 dB – 18 dB = 1 dB ref Po; and,
converting 1 dB by dividing by 10 yields the exponent of ten as 100.1,
which equals 1.259 and denotes a 25.9% increase above the original.
Further, to be precise, +3dB ref Po by logarithmic calculation is the result of a doubling of its original power level, such that:
10log10 [(2.0 ∙ Po) ÷ (Po)] = 10log10 [(100.30103)]; and,
rounding the exponent to 0.3 the calculation approximates
10log10 [(100.1)3] = 3 dB ref Po, which is a cube of its base value.
Moreover, a +10 dB gain in power level implies a 10-fold increase over the original level, 10 :: 1, whereas a -20 dB loss implies a 100-fold decrease, 1/100 :: 1, such that:
10log10 [101 ÷ 100] = 10 x (+1 – 0) = +10 dB ref Po; and,
10log10 [10-2 ÷ 100] = 10 x (-2 – 0) = -20 dB ref Po.
The decibel is also used to express either voltage or current ratios, as either an electro-motive force, E, in units of volts, V, or a magneto-motive force, I, in units of amperes, A. Notably, these electrical forces are squared terms in their respective power-expressions, acting as if their motive force was an “electrical-pressure,” where P = E2/R = I2R; and,
P2, in dB ref P1, = 10log10 [(V2 /V1)2], and 10log10 [(A2 /A1)2]; or,
= 20log10 [(V2 /V1)], and 20log10 [(A2 /A1)], whereas R1 = R2.
Strictly though, when the decibel is used to express voltage or current ratios in lieu of power ratios, then the voltages or currents in the expression must be measured at places having identical electrical impedances, that is, R1 ≡ R2.
Further, by extension, the relation between the number of decibels and the corresponding ratios of voltages and currents are sometimes applied where the values in the ratios are not the square roots of the corresponding electrical power ratios, that is, not from the initial E22/R2 and E12/R1 expressions. To preclude confusion, a specific statement of the particular application should accompany such usage. Preferably, such extensions of terms should be avoided.
Intensity, I, is defined in units of power, P, applied over an area, A, which is in units of square-length unit, such as m2. Whereas, P is work per increment of time, t, in units of seconds, s, and work is a force, F, applied in a given distance, or length, l, then P is in units for force-length per time, F∙l/t, such as, ft•lbf/s, dyn•cm/s, or N•m/s.
As defined in Newton’s Laws, F is the instantaneous rate of change of momentum with respect to time; whereas, momentum is the inertia of a body-mass, m, moving with some velocity, v, and defined in units of mass-length per increment of time, t.
By calculus, the time-derivative of this defining product for momentum, as it undergoes an instantaneous rate of change with respect to an infinitesimal increment of time, dt, yields an expression that defines force, F, with two additive terms. The first term is the multiplication of the mass, m, by the time-derivative of the velocity, v, which yields, m∙ (dv/dt). The second additive term is the multiplication of the velocity, v, by the time-derivative of the mass, m, which yields, v∙ (dm/dt).
Notably, for momentum, if only the velocity term is undergoing an instantaneous rate of change with respect to time, but not its mass, then dm/dt = 0, and thus the additive term of v∙(dm/dt) = 0. Therefore, classically, F = m∙a, where dv/dt = a, which is acceleration in units of length per square-time, ft/s2, cm/s2, or m/s2, where m is the symbol for mass in units of lbf/ft/s2, g or kg, whereas Force, F, is expressed in units of lbf, dyn, or N—a la, a Newton of force.

Definition. Sound is a distinguishing physical wave, a sound-wave, per se. Lord Raleigh in his work, “Theory of Sound,” volumes 1 and 2, Dover Publications, New York, 1945, defined a sound-wave as an alteration in pressure, stress, particle displacement, or particle velocity that is propagated in an elastic material, or the superposition of such propagated alterations in that medium. Further, a sound-sensation is produced through the ear by the above alterations.
Van Nostrand’s Scientific Encyclopedia defines sound somewhat more physically as a longitudinal elastic wave-motion propagated by alternate compressions and rarefactions of the medium. The analogy stated therein is that sound is like the propagation of a “bump,” or a “jerk,” from a freight-train’s engine to its caboose.
Thus, a sound-wave of acoustical energy only can propagate in a medium, being it a gas, a liquid, or a solid; and, it is either deflected or refracted, or both, at the laminar boundary between media of differing densities. In the denser media, or in a heated gas, the molecules orbit in closer proximity to one another such that the “bumps” propagate faster. Distinctly, the closer the orbiting molecules are to one another then the better the propagation of the sound– that is, the sound is demonstrably “louder.” Conversely, void of any molecules to “bump,” such as in a vacuum, sound cannot propagate; in other words, you cannot hear yourself scream in space.
Sound-intensity is defined as Power per unit area, which is the average rate (time) of sound-energy transmitted in a specified direction as it impinged on an area normal to this direction of propagation. In notational form, sound-intensity, I, of a spherical-wave, or even a plane-wave, in the direction of propagation can be expressed as being directly proportional to the square of its impinging pressure and indirectly proportional to the acoustic impedance in which it is propagating, that is:
I = [(pressure) 2 ÷ (medium-density) ∙ (sound-speed)].
I is expressed in terms of the square of the impinging sound-pressure, p, with respect to the acoustical impedance of the medium, ρ∙c. Accordingly, the resultant-product of the density of the medium, ρ, multiplied by the speed of sound, c, in that medium, is (kg/m3) ∙ (m/s) in MKS-units, which further reduces to Newton-seconds per cubic-meter, N∙s/m3. The square of p is in (N/m2)2. And, to be a comparable sound-intensity level, the sensed I must be in a ratio with a previously sensed level, or a reference-level, I ref, where both are in units of power per an area common to both, P/Ao, a la, the sensing area of the ear, or the sensing area of an underwater transducer.
In either case, Ao is a unit-area equal to 1, since A1 ≡ A2, such that A1 / A2 = 1. Therefore, sound-intensity, I, in SI-units, is Watts per unit-square-meter, W/mo2, that is:
F, in N, = kg∙m/s2; when v∙ (dm/dt) = 0; whereas,
P, in W, = [(kg∙m/s2) •m/s] = N•m/s; whereas,
I, inW/m2 = [(N•m/s)/m2]; factored with (N/m2) ∙ (m2/N) • (s/s) = 1.0, yields,
I, inW/m2 = [(N•m/s)/m2]•[(N/m2)∙(m2/N)•(s/s) = [(N/m2)2] ÷ [N∙s/m3]; which is I, inW/m2 = [(N/m2)2]•[(kg•m/s2)•s/m3)] = [(N/m2)2] ÷ [(kg/m3)•(m/s) = p2/ρc.
Particularly, the squared sound-pressure, p2, is expressed in units of (N/m2)2, and the acoustic impedance, ρ∙c, is expressed in units of N∙s/m3. Thus, I reduces to (N•m/s)/m2, which relates to power per unit-area, P/Ao, which in W/m2 can be converted to CGS-units by multiplying by W/m2 by a conversion factor of 107, and conversely by 10-7.
Discernibly though, when sound-intensity, I, as P/Ao, is expressed in dBref, then it is known as a Sound-Intensity Level, SIL; and, by decibel-definition is expressed as a power ratio for a common area, a la, a unit-area, in that, SILdB = 10log10 [P1 :: Po], where Po is some Pref MDS.
Typically, the measure of SILdB in any medium is referenced, that is, “zeroed,” to some set standard, which is not necessarily the MDS that the acoustical receptor can detect, a la, “sense,” in that medium. For veritable comparison of differing sound-intensity levels given in decibels, dB, it is imperative that this reference-level be noted.
Simply though, the ratio of I2 / I1 reduces to p22 / p12, where ρ∙c / ρ∙c = 1. Thus, for a Sound-Pressure Level, SPLdB, in air, the reference, pref air, is the Minimum-Audible-Field, the MAF, for the human ear in air, which is:
pref MAF = 2.0 x 10-4 dyn/cm2 = 2.0 x 10-5 N/m2 = 20 x 10-6 Pa
= 20 μPa, where N/m2 is defined in MKS units as a Pascal, Pa.
Remarkably though, for sensing acoustical sound-pressure levels in water, modern-day electrostriction-ceramic transducers, coupled with advanced digital, number-crunching, acoustic signal processors, are “zeroed” to 1 μPa, which is 20 times more sensitive as a reference than the MAFair; whereas,
20log10 [(1/20) μPa] = -26 dB ref 20 μPa “down” from that for 20 μPa.
The characteristic acoustical impedances for differing media are experimentally determined, and the measurement of each is certified as a physical constant for universal reference. As such, the gaseous density of air and the speed of sound in it are delineated below– as measured in the sonic frequency range at 0 degrees Celsius, C, and 760 millimeters of mercury, mmHg, with 0.03-mole-percent content of CO2. Furthermore, from 0o C to about +20o C, the speed of sound in air, cair, demonstrably varies by a factor of [60.7 x Tdegrees C]. For reference some comparable values are shown below:
Density of medium: ρo air = 1.2931 x 10-3 g/cm3 at 760 mmHg; and,
ρ1 air 200 C = 1.2078 x 10-3 g/cm3 at 760 mmHg.
Speed of Sound: co air = 3.3145 x 104 cm/sec at 0oC; and,
c1 air 20oC = 3.4359 x 104 cm/sec at 20oC; such that,
Acoustic Impedance: ρo∙c air = 4.2860 x 101 dyn∙s/cm3, and,
ρ1∙c air 20oC = 4.1499 x 101 dyn∙s/cm3.

Moreover, SIL ref air is derived from the p ref MAF, which is 2.0 x 10-4 dyn/cm2, thus:
I air, in W/cm2 = (2.0 x10-4)2 ÷ (4.2860 xl01) = 9.3327 x10-10; convert with x10-7,
Io air, in W/m2 = (9.3327 xl0-10 x10-7) = 9.3327 x10-17; then, in dB,
SIL ref W/m2 = 10log10 [(9.3327 x l0-17) = [9.7 dB -170 dB]
≈ -160 dB ref, the reference; whereas, the inverse-log yields,
Io air, in W/m2 = 10-16 W/m2, which is the reference, Io air; therefore,
SIL dB = 10log10 [I] -10log10 [Io air]; whereas, for Sound Pressure Level,
SPL dB = 20log10 [p] -20log10 [po air]; whereas, a SIL of -160 dB equates to
SIL dB = 0 dB as referenced to 10-16 W/m2; and,
1 dBref 10-16W/m2= -159.3 dB – (-160.3 dB] = 10log10 [10-15.93] -10log10 [10-16.03];
10-15.93 x107 = (p)2 ÷ 4.286 x101; then, solving for p yields,
p = 2.244 xl0-4 dyn/cm2 = 2.244 x10-5 N/m2 = 2.244 x10-5 Pa; where,
(2.244×10-5 Pa) ÷ (6.8945 xl03 Pa/lbf/in2) = 3.255 x l0-9 lbf/in2.
This is the math that proves that our binaural hearing system can detect very minute changes in sound-pressure levels, within our audible frequency-range. By convention, that audible frequency-range is known as the [our] sonic band. Its range is from 16 Hz to 16 kHz, with a maximum sensitivity at about 2 kHz, from which our 2,000 Hz conversational band extends to about 4 kHz . Also, by convention, frequencies below 16 Hz are sub-sonic, whereas those above 16 kHz are ultra-sonic, and thereby denote sound-frequencies that are inaudible—for us. Notably, super-sonic is a speed greater than the speed of sound, c, in reference to the medium of propagation.
Sound percussions, “beats and bumps,” vary in intensity. As an example, consider an explosion of 50 pounds of TNT, which results in a change of SPL equal to one atmosphere, Δ14.6972 lbf/in2. The SPLdB for this near-instantaneous change of pressure– measured 10 feet from the source, reference 0.0002 dyn/cm2, or 20 μPa, is as follows:
SPL ref 20 μPa = 20log10 [(14.6972 lbf/in2)∙(6.8945 x103 Pa/lbf/in2)] -201og10 [20 x10-6Pa]
≈ [40 +60 dB] – [26 -120 dB] = 194 dB ref 20 μPa; whereas,
1.000 atm = (14.6972)∙(6.8945 x103 Pa)∙(9.869 x10-6 atm/Pa)
= 1.0 xl06 μbars = l.0 xl06 dyn/cm2 = 1.0 xl05 Pa.
Some examples of sound-intensity in air, referenced to 10-16 W/m2, are:
(1) The threshold of painful sound is 130 dB, or about 0.009 lbf/in2.
(2) The subway-express passing the station emits 102 dB, or about 0.0004 lbf/in2.
(3) Normal conversational speech at one meter is 70 dB, or about 0.000009 lbf/in2.
(4) A quiet whisper heard at five feet is 18 dB, or about 0.00000002 lbf/in2.
Notably, it is painful to feel (sense) a change in pressure on your ear drum of 9/1000th of pound per square inch.
For a denser media, no pun intended, consider seawater at 15 degrees Centigrade, and a salinity of 36 ppt, parts per thousand, which equates to a Specific Gravity, also a unit-less ratio, of 1.025; such that,
Density, ρo seawater = 1.025 g/cm3; and,
Speed of Sound, c seawater = 1.505 x l05 cm/s; such that,
Acoustical Impedance, ρo∙c seawater = 1.5426 x 105 dyn∙s/cm3, at 15oC, and so = 36 ppt.

 Discernibly, the acoustical impedance of seawater, ρo∙cseawater, is about 3600 times greater than ρo∙cair; in that, (1.5426x l05) ÷ (4.2860 x 101) ≈ 3600:
10log10 [3600] = 35.5630 ≈ +36 dB ref ρ∙c air “up” from air.

In that the speed of sound, c, varies directly with the density of the medium, the acoustical impedance varies accordingly. Notably, if the same sound-pressure, p air, is applied in seawater as intensely as it was in air, then the corresponding SIL seawater will be more due to the greater acoustical impedance in the denser medium.
Notably, the sound in seawater will be +36 dBref ρ0∙c air “louder” than it was in air. Thus, sound-intensities in different media vary directly with the characteristic acoustical impedance of the propagating medium, ρc ref medium. And, for example, the SPL air of normal conversational speech heard at 4 feet, or about 120 cm, is 0.645 dyn/cm2, therefore:
SIL air = 10log10 [((0.645 dyn/cm2)2 ÷ (42.86 dyn∙s/cm3)) x10-7)] -10log10 [10-16 W/m2]
≈ [(-4 dB) –(16 dB) –70 dB] -[-160 dB] = 70 dB ref 10-16 W/m2.
If that same sound-pressure of 0.645 dyn/cm2 in air is applied in seawater, then for a SIL seawater, a SIL ref for that denser medium must be referenced to the MAF in air, such that:
IMAF seawater = ((0.0002dyn/cm2)2 ÷ (ρo∙cseawater)) x10-7)
= ((4.0×10-8) ÷ (1.5426xl05)) x10-7)
= 2.5930 x10-20 ≈ 2.6 x10-20 W/m2; and,
SILseawater = 10log10 [((0.645)2 ÷ (ρo∙cair)) x10-7] – 10log10 [2.6 x10-20 W/m2]
= 10log10[((4.160 x10-1) ÷ (1.5426xl05)) x10-7mo)] – 10log10 [2.6 x10-20 W/m2]
≈ [(-4 dB) –(2 +50 dB) +(-70 dB)] – [4 -200 dB] = 70 dB ref 2.6 x 10-20 W/m2.
Albeit the dB levels are the same, the references are different, that is, ref 2.6 x10-20 W/m2in seawater, differs from ref 10-16 W/m2in air, and therefore, one deduces that the human ear is better suited for sensing Sounds in the Air than it is for Sounds in the Sea. Neither is the comparison below veritable, in that the minimum sound-pressure level sensed by the human ear in air is not comparable to the “zeroed” reference level for a modern ceramic transducer in seawater:
SPL air = 20 log10 [0.645 dyn/cm2] -20 log10 [0.0002 dyn/cm2] ≈ [-4 dB] – [-74 dB]
= 70 dB ref 0.0002 dyn/cm2 = 70 dB ref 20 μPa; and,
SPLseawater = 20 log10 [0.0645 Pa] -20log10 [1 x10-6 Pa]
= [(-24 dB) –(-120 dB)] = 96 dB ref 1 μPa, the difference of the references.
With respect to the sensitivity of the acoustical receptor, consider that an earlier design of a magnetostriction electro-acoustic transducer, a la a hydrophone, could be “zeroed” to 1 dyn/cm2@4ft as its pref in seawater. In comparison, today’s electrostriction electro-acoustic ceramic transducers can be “zeroed” to 1 μPa, which is 100000 times more sensitive, in that, 1 dyn/cm2 = 0.1 Pa = 1 x10-5 μPa, a technological advance of +50 dB ref 1 dyn/cm2.

Summation– with an example. Our binaural hearing system has a low threshold for sensing acoustic energy levels—within our sonic frequency-band. Moreover, we can discern relatively small changes in those incoming acoustic levels.
Patently, by advances in modern technology, ceramic electrostriction-transducers coupled with powerful digital-signal processors have much lower detection thresholds than we do just hearing through our ears; and, can discern much smaller increments of level-changes.
Some say, perhaps for marketing hype, that their hearing-assisted amplification devices can sense, “hear,” a sparrow’s heartbeat across the street. Nonetheless, there are devices that can “hear” normal conversation inside a room from across the street—or, from a helicopter patrolling overhead.
In regard to measurement, it is somewhat more difficult [more $$$] to measure changes in sound-intensity, or sound-power levels, and record the SIL in dB for the respective I, than it is to measure changes in sound-pressure, and simply note the SPL in dB as indicated on the meter-face for the impinging p. Similarly, dB can be measured for reciprocatory transducer voltages, as referenced to the electro-mechanical measuring instrument’s “zeroed” setting for a MDS.
 Practically, SPL in dB is the preferred measurement for Sounds in the Sea.
To close with an intriguing example of a somewhat foreboding man-made sound …in the Sea, consider a coal-oil powered [diesel-electric] submarine-warship running submerged at about 200 feet making 170 RPM [≈8 knots]—and, radiating broadband noise from water-cavitations caused by the thrashing rotation of the ship’s propulsion screws.
Markedly though, the processed sound-pressure spectrum peaks at about 28 dB ref 1 dyn/cm2@ 4 ft, and is centered around 1-kHz. This SPL dB equates to p seawater of 2.55 x 101 dyn/cm2. Its SIL dB is comparable to 102 dB ref 10-16 W/m2 in the air at the passenger-platform as the subway-express passes through the station; whereas, the I air for the subway-express is 1.58 x 10-6 W/cm2.
Notably, 102 dB ref 10-16 W/m2 is just -3 dB “down” from 105 dB ref 10-16 W/m2, the sound-intensity level at which the US Navy requires the donning of double-ear protection.
Q: Is that close enough for government work, or is it a doubling of the sound-intensity?
A: Well now, you know precisely how much that is, to wit: 2∙(1.6 x 10-16 W/m2). qed.

Most importantly: Always note the dB reference for Apple-to-Apple comparisons. ▄

“O, GOD, THY SEA IS SO GREAT,
AND MY BOAT IS SO SMALL.”

TABLE OF SOUND INTENSITIES.
[Note: For I W/m2 = p2/ρ0∙c air, where ρ1∙cair = 41.15 N∙s/m3; and, p ref = 1 dyn/cm2 @ 4 ft for SPL dB.]
Sound SIL dB I in p in SPL dB
Type ref 10-16 W/m2 W/m2 dyn/cm2 ref 1 dyn/cm2 @ 4ft
Saturn Rocket 194 2.4 x103 1.01 x106 120
Flight Deck Ops 140 1.0 x10-2 2.04 x103 66
Excruciating Pain 130 1.0 x10-3 6.45 x102 56
Missile Tube Vent 120 1.0 x10-4 2.04 x102 46
Rock Concert 115 3.2 x10-5 1.14 x102 41
Marine Diesel 110 1.0 x10-5 6.45 x101 36
Radial Saw 105 3.2 x10-6 3.68 x101 31
Subway Express 102 1.6 x10-6 2.55 x101 28
Paint Chipper 100 1.0 x10-6 2.04 x101 26
Lawn Mower 95 3.2 x10-7 1.14 x101 21
Niagara Falls 92 1.6 x10-7 8.08 x100 18
Shouted Speech 90 1.0 x10-7 6.45 x100 16
Forklift 85 3.2 x10-6 3.68 x100 11
Conversation 70 1.0 x10-9 6.45 x10-1 -4
Average Office 55 3.2 x10-11 1.14 x10-1 -19
Average Home 40 1.0 x10-12 2.04 x10-2 -34
Rustling Leaves 20 1.0 x10-14 2.04 x10-3 -54
Quiet Whisper 18 6.3 x10-15 1.62 x10-3 -56
MAF reference level 0 1.0 x10-16 2.00 x10-4 -74
Sample Calculations:
SIL dB = 10log10 [1.6 x 10-6 W/cm2] –10log10 [1 x 10-16] ≈ [+2 dB -60 dB] –[-160 dB] = 102 dB ref 10-16 W/m2.
SPL dB = 20 log10 [2.55 x 101 dyn/cm2] -10 log10 [1 dyn/cm2] ≈ [+8 dB +20 dB] –[0 dB] = 28 dB ref 1 dyn/cm2 @ 4ft.
P W/mo2 = p2 ÷ ρ1∙cair = [(2.55 x 101 dyn/cm2)2 x 10-3 x 10-4] ÷ [(41.1551 N∙s/m3)] = 1.580 W/m2; where,
ρ1∙cair = 41.1551 N∙s/m3 is for the extant air-density in the subway-express station at the time of measurement.


Sign Up For ATI Courses eNewsletter

Rating 3.00 out of 5
[?]

, , , , ,

2 Comments

Is US The Hottest Place On Earth? Yes, it is!

More precisely it definitely was in the month of July 2011 according to NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL).

On average the temperatures were 20 degrees Fahrenheit higher than normal. This led to the deaths of dozens of citizen.
NASA AIRS (Atmoshperic Infrared Shounder) movies below show the heat wave evolution.
Click on an individual image for the movie

figure 1 for PIA14480 figure 2 for PIA14480
figure 3 for PIA14480
figure 4 for PIA14480
Surface Air Temp
Daytime
Surface Skin Temp
Daytime
Surface Air Temp
Nighttime
Surface Skin Temp
Nighttime

The movies demonstrate surface air temperature and surface skin temperature, during both daytime and nighttime conditions.

What is surface air temperature?

It is something we experience whenever we go outside. High surface air temperature makes even shady places feel hot.

What is Surface skin temperature?

It is  is what we feel when we touch the ground.

What is the difference between the daytime and nighttime temperature?

During daytime, the surface skin temperature is generally much warmer than surface air temperature because dark surfaces are so effective at absorbing sunlight. The surface air and skin temperatures are related by something invisible but actually quite familiar: infrared — or heat — radiation. Our skin is very sensitive to infrared radiation, making a sun-heated wall feel warm even from a few feet away after sunset. Air absorbs very little sunlight, but easily absorbs infrared radiation emitted by the warm surface. It’s the sun-warmed surface — not sunlight — that heats the air during daytime.

What are your survival techniques for this hot summer?  Please comment below…

 


Sign Up For ATI Courses eNewsletter

Rating 3.00 out of 5
[?]

, , , , , , ,

No Comments